External quality assessment (EQA) provides an independent check on the accuracy of the laboratory’s results. The laboratory receives unknown samples, analyses them, and submits results to the scheme organiser. Results are compared against peer laboratories or a target value. Poor EQA performance must be investigated as a nonconformity. ISO 15189 requires EQA participation for all examinations where a scheme is available.
|
✓
Good practice The quality manager raises a formal nonconformity. Investigation: QC data from the same period is reviewed — a gradual upward drift in the high-level PT control is visible in the chart but did not trigger a Westgard rule. The analyser is recalibrated and reagent lot is reviewed. EQA samples are re-run with the recalibrated system. The next scheduled EQA cycle shows the bias resolved. The investigation and corrective action are documented.
|
✗
Poor practice The quality manager records the EQA result as noted and waits for the next cycle, reasoning that internal QC was passing at the time. The next two EQA cycles show the same bias — 15% and 12%. Three consecutive poor results trigger a formal EQA provider review. What could have been resolved with a calibration check in month one is now a three-cycle finding on the laboratory’s accreditation record.
|